|
| |||||
Harshaw Chemical
From Brooklyn Centre Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:They were providing feed material, for the Oak Ridge facility in Tennessee, in the form of Uranium hexafluoride. As early as October of 1942, they were producing 700 pounds per day. | :They were providing feed material, for the Oak Ridge facility in Tennessee, in the form of Uranium hexafluoride. As early as October of 1942, they were producing 700 pounds per day. | ||
Some of this material was used to produce the "Little Boy" atom bomb that bombed Hiroshima. | Some of this material was used to produce the "Little Boy" atom bomb that bombed Hiroshima. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | <div style="margin-left:1.0cm;margin-right:1.0cm;font-size:80%;border:1px solid #a3bfb1;text-align:left;color:#000;padding:0.8em 0.8em;"> | ||
| + | <p style='font-style:italic'>"...the quoted material is entered here and should appear in italics."</p> | ||
| + | <p style="text-align:right"> | ||
| + | --BOOK TITLE by The Distinguished Author's Name | ||
| + | </p> | ||
| + | </div> | ||
| + | :''IEER's study also found evidence that plant authorities and the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC), which contracted with these private companies to process material for its nuclear weapons program, were aware that workers at these plants were being overexposed over prolonged periods of time. Furthermore, there is no indication that the authorities shared this overexposure information with the plant workers. In fact, there are documents that indicate that plant authorities and AEC personnel lied to the workers about the levels of radiation to which they were being exposed. For example, in a January 1948 letter to the Vice President of Harshaw Chemical Co., Harshaw's Medical Manager wrote: "...it is obvious that concentrations considerably above the preferred level are common in Area C." (Area C is an area in the Harshaw plant.) He also wrote, "…a distinct hazard does exist in Area C." In the same letter he states that the Medical office "still believes" that the "logical method of approach" is to continue telling the employees at Area C "that all of our records indicated that no unusual hazard existed …"'' | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::*http://judiciary.house.gov/legacy/ledw0921.htm | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | :''A cohort mortality study showed significant excesses of respiratory cancer and melanoma. 92% of those (28) dying of respiratory cancer during 1950-78 had potential exposure before or between 1950-52. Exposures included uranium fluoride for work supporting the Manhattan Project. Some of the hazards are already known or suspected.'' | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::*http://yosemite.epa.gov/oppts/epatscat8.nsf/ReportSearchView/5CD8553DD51923C685256930004C6D14 | ||
| + | |||
:The news of this was probably a complete surprise to nearby residents in the St. Barbara's Church parish. It's likely that even employees of the plant, who did not have the proper clearance, were aware of what was going on in some portions of the plant. If radioactive emissions were affecting the neighborhoods up the hill from the plant, it might be the cause for the children known to have had, and died from, Leukemia. (Andrew Minich and James Wodzisz) | :The news of this was probably a complete surprise to nearby residents in the St. Barbara's Church parish. It's likely that even employees of the plant, who did not have the proper clearance, were aware of what was going on in some portions of the plant. If radioactive emissions were affecting the neighborhoods up the hill from the plant, it might be the cause for the children known to have had, and died from, Leukemia. (Andrew Minich and James Wodzisz) | ||
| + | :Known employees from the neighborhood were Andrew Minich (father of the above Andrew), Stanley Zastawny, and Raymond Kapusta. | ||
| - | ''My husband's uncle, Raymond Kapusta, | + | ''My husband's uncle, Raymond Kapusta, never once even alluded to something like this.''<br> |
--[[User:Sandy|Sandy]] 09:46, 2 March 2007 (PST) Sandra Rozhon | --[[User:Sandy|Sandy]] 09:46, 2 March 2007 (PST) Sandra Rozhon | ||
Revision as of 18:02, 2 March 2007
Location: 1000 Harvard Ave., Cleveland, Ohio 44109
- Aside from the usual chemicals, Harshaw was also processing radioactive materials from August 1942 to 1955.
- They were providing feed material, for the Oak Ridge facility in Tennessee, in the form of Uranium hexafluoride. As early as October of 1942, they were producing 700 pounds per day.
Some of this material was used to produce the "Little Boy" atom bomb that bombed Hiroshima.
"...the quoted material is entered here and should appear in italics."
--BOOK TITLE by The Distinguished Author's Name
- IEER's study also found evidence that plant authorities and the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC), which contracted with these private companies to process material for its nuclear weapons program, were aware that workers at these plants were being overexposed over prolonged periods of time. Furthermore, there is no indication that the authorities shared this overexposure information with the plant workers. In fact, there are documents that indicate that plant authorities and AEC personnel lied to the workers about the levels of radiation to which they were being exposed. For example, in a January 1948 letter to the Vice President of Harshaw Chemical Co., Harshaw's Medical Manager wrote: "...it is obvious that concentrations considerably above the preferred level are common in Area C." (Area C is an area in the Harshaw plant.) He also wrote, "…a distinct hazard does exist in Area C." In the same letter he states that the Medical office "still believes" that the "logical method of approach" is to continue telling the employees at Area C "that all of our records indicated that no unusual hazard existed …"
- A cohort mortality study showed significant excesses of respiratory cancer and melanoma. 92% of those (28) dying of respiratory cancer during 1950-78 had potential exposure before or between 1950-52. Exposures included uranium fluoride for work supporting the Manhattan Project. Some of the hazards are already known or suspected.
- The news of this was probably a complete surprise to nearby residents in the St. Barbara's Church parish. It's likely that even employees of the plant, who did not have the proper clearance, were aware of what was going on in some portions of the plant. If radioactive emissions were affecting the neighborhoods up the hill from the plant, it might be the cause for the children known to have had, and died from, Leukemia. (Andrew Minich and James Wodzisz)
- Known employees from the neighborhood were Andrew Minich (father of the above Andrew), Stanley Zastawny, and Raymond Kapusta.
My husband's uncle, Raymond Kapusta, never once even alluded to something like this.
--Sandy 09:46, 2 March 2007 (PST) Sandra Rozhon
